Dealing with a grown up daughter with autism each day, good and bad, ups and downs. Some other stuff as well, because I have to make sure life isn't all about autism.
Tuesday, 24 November 2009
Charity Stays At Home.
Tuesday, 10 November 2009
Not So Easy To Silence
Not so easy to silenceInbox X
| show details 12:12 (5 hours ago) |
You're not so easy to silence
Dear Irene,
With just a few days of consultation left now, Andy Burnham's attempt to 'close down . . . the debate and controversy over disability living allowance' seems to have been only a partial success.
As we explained in our last newsletter, Burnham gave an assurance that DLA for people aged under 65 was not going to form part of the funding for the National Care Service. Like many others, we pointed out that this means that DLA for people aged 65 and over, as well as AA, is still under threat. We urged people not to let this cunningly worded concession succeed in silencing them.
And you certainly didn't.
People have continued to sign the No 10 petition, which is now at number 6 on the Downing Street site with over 20,000 signatures.
http://petitions.number10.gov.
And posts have continued to pour into the Big Care debate website which now has almost 3,400 submissions.
http://careandsupport.direct.
Many recent posts make it clear that you are aware that assurances have been give about DLA for people aged under 65, but you're still not happy.
In addition, following our revelations in a members only article on the site at the end of last month, many recent posts have been about the fact that the government proposes to send everyone a one-off £20,000 tax bill on their 65th birthday to help cover the cost of the proposed National Care Service.
More secrecy around National Care Service
http://www.benefitsandwork.co.
The tax will be means-tested, so not everyone will have to pay the full amount. But it can be recovered from your estate after you die, if you own a home or other property. And the tax also won't cover the cost of food and accommodation if you have to go into residential care, only the care itself.
So, you still facing losing your disability benefits at age 65, you'll still get handed a £20,000 tax bill and yet, if you do have to go into residential care for two years, the green paper estimates that you will still have to pay half of the estimated £50,000 cost from your own pocket.
MPs were also not fooled into silence by Burnham's DLA announcement. In a debate on the proposals at the end of last month, Burnham was repeatedly questioned about whether DLA for people aged 65 and over would be used to fund the National Care Service. He repeatedly dodged answering the question.
Burnham refuses to answer DLA questions
http://www.benefitsandwork.co.
Suspicions about the government's plans have been further fuelled by its refusal to publish promised details of how the new service will be funded.
More secrecy around National Care Service
http://www.benefitsandwork.co.
A coalition of charities - the Care and Support Alliance - is now set to make a Freedom of Information request to try to obtain the information.
Unfortunately, there is at least one organisation which continues to claim that DLA is now safe. . . Disability Alliance. Until the end of last week their home page still proclaimed 'DLA no longer part of social care plans. See our press release.'
The link has now been removed from their home page, but the press release stating that ". . . the Disability Living Allowance (DLA) benefit will not be affected by Government plans to merge some benefits with social care funding" remains. So, Burnham may have succeeded in closing down the debate in one place at least.
For the rest of us, we still have until Friday to make our contribution to the Big Care debate and to sign the petition.
We'll be back next Tuesday with our final email of this campaign and information about how you can stay in touch with what happens next.
Good luck,
Steve Donnison
Please feel free to forward or publish this article.
Benefits and Work Publishing Ltd
www.benefitsandwork.co.uk
Company registration No. 5962666
POST YOUR NEWS
Finally, remember that you can post your news in the Benefits and Work forum, if you’re a member, at:
http://www.benefitsandwork.co.
and/or in the free welfare watch forums at:
http://welfarewatch.
You can also keep up with news about opposition to the green paper at the Carer Watch campaign blog:
Unfortunately, we’re getting so many emails on this subject that we are unlikely to be able to respond individually. But we do appreciate hearing your news and views and we do encourage you to publish them for others to read on the forums detailed above.
Sunday, 1 November 2009
Welfare Benefits, Or How Hard Do I Have To Work To Deserve Them
I always considered myself way too self centered to be any sort of mother, and to be brutally honest again, I never got on with any of the kids that belonged to my friends and went into a blind panic if ever asked to 'watch them for a minute' I was totally confounded by the presentation of the 'latest addition' which had to be coo'ed over and told it looked just like some other member of the family, a resemblance I could never see, when the reality was a red, wrinkly, wriggly, smelly and squawking little thing wrapped in pink or blue to define gender. I could never remember their names, neither were their birthdays engraved on my memory and heaven forbid that one of the little blighters would prefix my name with Auntie! I'm an only child for Christs sakes, there is no way I can be anybodies Auntie!
So there I am in 1985, nice quiet little business just the two of us. Scraping a living together in a craft business, nothing big, just comfortable after the excesses of the 70's, and I find myself pregnant. D'oh! I was 34yrs old and on the pill! How the.... yes well, there you go, Ce la vie, as they say and you have options. Well no, not really, it's a new challenge lets go for it, we had to take this seriously, so we got married, to this day I don't know why, it made no difference at all, but that is another blog for another time.
First child born 19th December 1985 by emergency cesarean section, then wrapped in a pink hospital blanket with the word 'girl' woven in stripes across it, you remember the oddest things don't you, coming out of the anesthetic that blanket was the first thing I saw. Child placed in my arms, I began to focus properly on what was happening, she was looking at me, no, not just looking at me, but searching about in my eyes, I reciprocated, a primitive, even primeval moment, never to be repeated but changing everything. And all my childless friends receded into the shadows.
1987, back on the pill, one child is enough, especially as the one we had was showing distinct signs of being autistic, not that I can get anyone to take me seriously, but that is yet another blog for yet another time, and what do you know... pregnant again. Phoned my Mum with the good news, "Ha, I only had you, you're on your own kid." were her loving words of encouragement and I progressed through the pregnancy with every known form of indigestion and a predisposition towards grumpiness. Determined not to endure another cesarean section, second child born 26th April 1988 in the conventional manner with no serious medical interventions and no pain relief. Another girl, good, not fond of little boys, this one didn't do the primeval soul searching look, this one just looked me straight in the eye and started bawling. I was ecstatically happy when the whole messy business was over, a month later husband had a vasectomy since the pill was proving unreliable, and two children was definitely enough!
Since we had our own business in those days inevitably I worked right up to the last minute with both pregnancies, and was back at some sort of work within a month, and we managed to keep the business running until it became obvious that first child, Sarah was not going to be able to attend and infant school near where we lived and if we stayed where we were the only option would have been a residential school many miles away, since it was clear her autism was severe we decided that sending her away from home at such a young age was not going to happen, we would have lost her had we gone along with that idea. Nothing for it, we had to relocate.
Which is how we ended up in the Cynon Valley, which like all people who have never come across it before, we innocently pronounced Sign On Valley, which we were soon to discover is what you do in the Cynon Valley, not the way you pronounce it. Here is the way the dictionary says it should be pronounced...
k | is pronounced as | k | in key | |
uh | is pronounced as | u | in up | |
n | is pronounced as | n | in no | |
uh | is pronounced as | u | in up | |
n | is pronounced as | n | in no |
Because Sarah had special needs we had plenty of help from Social Services, As far as children's services go, I cannot fault the Rhondda Cynon Taff council. They have been brilliant with Sarah all through her school life, from 5 right up to 18, 1st couple of years in an observation unit in an ordinary primary school, and then in the local and quite excellent Maesgwyn Special School, which I can never praise highly enough for the care they took over Sarah's education. Sarah managed two years in a special unit within the local college before education was over and Adult services took over, transition is tricky and needs to be handled with care, but that is another blog, actually it is more than a blog, its a hand book, I'll come back to it sometime.
I digress, all the while the kids are at school and because of Sarah's special needs, as a family we were well served by Social Services, and were regularly visited by the welfare benefits department to make sure we were receiving as much help as was available, financial and otherwise. But the girls are no longer children. Hannah has sensibly stayed on in Bath after University, and Sarah will be 24 in December, and as far as we are concerned as a family, looking after Sarah now is harder and more expensive than it was when she was a child, she still doesn't always sleep, and now we have to stop her from eating as opposed to encouraging her to eat, in fact, you could describe her as high maintenance. She is very expensive to run! Sarah is our work, we spend hours arranging things for her, fixing the things she breaks because we cannot afford to replace stuff as frequently as we would like. Sarah is a bit clumsy, so stuff gets dropped or just not used properly and consequently just breaks down, CD's and CD players are doomed as soon as they enter her room, we tend to make a lot of copies and I really have lost count of the number of CD players she has destroyed, three so far this year. Ebay has been a godsend!
Lets do the sums, there are 168 hours in a week, up to 34 of these hours Sarah is being cared for by social services so that leaves 134 hours for us to care for her. That means the carers allowance is being paid at a rate of £o.39 per hour (for the two of us). Under the new fairer charging system for social care for those living at home, the local council is currently expecting Sarah to pay £75.00 per week for those 34 hours, very reasonable at 2.20 per hour (if she were to use all those hours up!), trouble is, once she has paid her £75.00 per week as a household with all the usual bills to pay, we are going to have serious problems making ends meet. Of necessity, Sarah pays her share.